|
Study design: Randomized controlled trial of exercise training in persons with spinal cord injury.
Objective:
The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of 9 months of
twice-weekly exercise training on strength, arm ergometry performance,
and indices of psychological well-being and quality of life.
Setting: Centre for Health Promotion and Rehabilitation, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Methods:
Thirty-four men and women (aged 19–65 years) with traumatic spinal cord
injury (C4–L1; ASIA A–D) of 1–24 years duration volunteered to
participate, and were randomized into exercise (EX; n=21) and control (CON; n=13)
groups. Twenty-three subjects (11 EX; 12 CON) successfully completed
the 9-month study. Subjects were assessed for one repetition maximum
(1RM) strength, arm ergometry performance, and several indices of
quality of life and psychological well-being at baseline, 3, 6, and 9
months.
Results: At baseline, there were no
significant differences between groups in age, submaximal arm ergometry
performance, muscle strength, or psychological well-being. Following
training, the EX group had significant increases in submaximal arm
ergometry power output (81%; P<0.05), and significant increases in upper body muscle strength (19–34%; P<0.05);
no significant changes occurred in CON. Participants in EX reported
significantly less pain, stress and depression after training, and
scored higher than CON in indices of satisfaction with physical
function, level of perceived health and overall quality of life (P<0.05).
Exercise adherence (per cent of prescribed sessions attended) in those
subjects who completed the 9 months of training was 82.5%.
Conclusions:
These results demonstrate that long-term twice-weekly exercise training
in this population is feasible, and results in significant gains in
both physical and psychological well-being.
Spinal Cord (2003) 41, 34–43. doi:10.1038/sj.sc.3101389
Long-term exercise training in persons with spinal cord
injury: effects on strength, arm ergometry performance and
psychological well-being
A L Hicks1, K A Martin1, D S Ditor1, A E Latimer1, C Craven2, J Bugaresti2 and N McCartney1
|